Birdwatch Note
2023-11-06 18:51:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The photo is misused as it shows known image of dust cloud Barnard68. The blog link in tweet below misuses the image again. https://blog.physics-astronomy.com/2023/11/hundreds-of-stars-have-vanished-without.html?m=1 The research article cited under the blog post uses correct relevant images. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/515/1/1380/6607509?login=false#366759789 Opinion: blogger is using/misusing image
Written by 8ADC39E2647A115C651A7E552C873343E1A8E524018F623D43F274CB74879765
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721565644896751652
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1721601278294499721
- noteId - 1721601278294499721
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8ADC39E2647A115C651A7E552C873343E1A8E524018F623D43F274CB74879765 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699296705207
- tweetId - 1721565644896751652
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The photo is misused as it shows known image of dust cloud Barnard68. The blog link in tweet below misuses the image again. https://blog.physics-astronomy.com/2023/11/hundreds-of-stars-have-vanished-without.html?m=1 The research article cited under the blog post uses correct relevant images. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/515/1/1380/6607509?login=false#366759789 Opinion: blogger is using/misusing image
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-06 18:51:45 UTC (1699296705207) |
2023-11-06 21:57:00 UTC (1699307820414) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-11-07 03:05:44 UTC (1699326344811) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-11-06 21:57:00 UTC (1699307820414) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-06 15:44:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:40:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:34:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:32:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:32:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:28:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:21:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:19:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:18:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:12:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:10:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:08:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:06:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:02:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 14:00:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:59:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:33:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:26:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:19:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:18:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:17:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:09:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:09:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:05:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:03:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 13:01:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-06 12:55:40 -0600 | Rating Details |