Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-06 09:46:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Les différences de salaires s’expliquent par la répartition genrée des professions. À poste comparable, c’est-à-dire à même profession exercée pour le même employeur, l’écart de salaire en équivalent temps plein se réduit à 4 % environ. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6960132

Written by D13E9A7B8DD5731E328E326ED20AFE35BD640AA097AA4C711BF64E16E4FDF629
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721422160424567170

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721464180299923560
  • noteId - 1721464180299923560
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D13E9A7B8DD5731E328E326ED20AFE35BD640AA097AA4C711BF64E16E4FDF629 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699264018501
  • tweetId - 1721422160424567170
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Les différences de salaires s’expliquent par la répartition genrée des professions. À poste comparable, c’est-à-dire à même profession exercée pour le même employeur, l’écart de salaire en équivalent temps plein se réduit à 4 % environ. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6960132

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-06 09:46:58 UTC
(1699264018501)
2023-11-06 14:02:12 UTC
(1699279332627)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-07 03:05:44 UTC
(1699326344811)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-11-06 14:02:12 UTC
(1699279332627)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-06 14:02:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 12:29:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 11:22:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 09:17:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 07:47:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:56:20 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:44:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:41:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:34:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:09:42 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:05:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:05:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 06:00:36 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 05:51:16 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 05:27:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 05:24:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 05:15:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 04:46:25 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 04:45:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 04:37:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 04:08:26 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 14:00:13 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 05:48:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 20:35:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 03:14:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 16:12:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 11:13:59 -0600 Rating Details