Birdwatch Note
2023-11-05 21:13:57 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Expresan una opinión lógica por pensar que el Red Bull, por ser mucho más rápido que el Aston Martín, adelantaría al otro coche, no fue así, no es necesaria nota
Written by 610B46D9E7783B5BEC0E77A2E71D98135AAED3D452D7E3C43633EF288254AAC0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721240662928957808
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1721274678545682817
- noteId - 1721274678545682817
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 610B46D9E7783B5BEC0E77A2E71D98135AAED3D452D7E3C43633EF288254AAC0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699218837759
- tweetId - 1721240662928957808
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Expresan una opinión lógica por pensar que el Red Bull, por ser mucho más rápido que el Aston Martín, adelantaría al otro coche, no fue así, no es necesaria nota
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-11-05 21:13:57 UTC (1699218837759) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-06 03:03:27 UTC (1699239807439) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-11-05 17:40:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 17:27:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 17:26:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 17:05:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 16:11:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 16:00:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 15:48:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-05 15:28:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 03:55:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 03:33:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 01:50:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-06 01:00:32 -0600 | Rating Details |