Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-05 17:49:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The source of “65% of Americans support a ceasefire” was collected by a Far Left organization, Data for Progress, which is not a reputable source for unbiased polling information on this issue. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_for_Progress#:~:text=Data%20for%20Progress's%20results%20have,polls%2C%20at%20least%20not%20yet.

Written by 3B868CE414C6658D6181CEA66D973B7B9770C97C7AB0A16D0CD352305F01F8D0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1721186581048955103

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1721223102296686780
  • noteId - 1721223102296686780
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3B868CE414C6658D6181CEA66D973B7B9770C97C7AB0A16D0CD352305F01F8D0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699206541024
  • tweetId - 1721186581048955103
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The source of “65% of Americans support a ceasefire” was collected by a Far Left organization, Data for Progress, which is not a reputable source for unbiased polling information on this issue. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_for_Progress#:~:text=Data%20for%20Progress's%20results%20have,polls%2C%20at%20least%20not%20yet.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-05 17:49:01 UTC
(1699206541024)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-06 03:03:27 UTC
(1699239807439)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-05 17:31:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 17:12:38 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 16:53:27 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 15:55:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 15:38:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 14:18:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 12:46:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 20:25:24 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 19:01:38 -0600 Rating Details