Birdwatch Note
2023-11-04 21:41:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The OP is correct. However the CN cherry-picks cases where the casualty estimate was correct, but not where it was hugely inflated. E.g. in Jenin in 2002, Palestinian estimated over 500 dead, but subsequent UN report concluded only 22 civilians died: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jenin_(2002)
Written by 68CBF413318437003FBB8AAD827F9E9DC34A09FC97FCD7CD480E32A05644A341
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720770947341258831
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720919179522347498
- noteId - 1720919179522347498
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 68CBF413318437003FBB8AAD827F9E9DC34A09FC97FCD7CD480E32A05644A341 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699134080187
- tweetId - 1720770947341258831
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The OP is correct. However the CN cherry-picks cases where the casualty estimate was correct, but not where it was hugely inflated. E.g. in Jenin in 2002, Palestinian estimated over 500 dead, but subsequent UN report concluded only 22 civilians died: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jenin_(2002)
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-04 21:41:20 UTC (1699134080187) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-05 00:41:56 UTC (1699144916529) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-04 17:54:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 17:47:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 17:34:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 16:59:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 16:51:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 15:28:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 13:52:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 11:34:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 05:48:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 05:04:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-05 04:06:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 21:37:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 21:28:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 20:45:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 20:26:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 20:23:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 20:11:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 20:01:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 19:57:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 19:33:42 -0500 | Rating Details |