Birdwatch Note
2023-11-04 14:12:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Cargill v. Garland seeks to reverse the ATF’s bump stick ban. The question posed is whether the ATF has the legislative authority to redefine how an automatic firearm (machine gun)is defined. There is no argument yet presented that a bump stock makes a weapon “more deadly.” https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-cargill/
Written by F52E431E5C570EA00BC89B6D3CF43D091531A4A9EC507EA0656C0153BA0A7CBC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720519102119243918
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720806326949826759
- noteId - 1720806326949826759
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F52E431E5C570EA00BC89B6D3CF43D091531A4A9EC507EA0656C0153BA0A7CBC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699107174032
- tweetId - 1720519102119243918
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Cargill v. Garland seeks to reverse the ATF’s bump stick ban. The question posed is whether the ATF has the legislative authority to redefine how an automatic firearm (machine gun)is defined. There is no argument yet presented that a bump stock makes a weapon “more deadly.” https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/garland-v-cargill/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-04 14:12:54 UTC (1699107174032) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-05 00:41:56 UTC (1699144916529) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |