Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-04 11:39:33 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

LCOE is slechts een component van de kosten van stroom. "The LCOE (levelized cost of electricity) should not be used alone to show the economic feasibility of nuclear power." "Nuclear power reduces the hourly electricity prices by 16% on average in 2050." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266679242200021X

Written by 772A1C7B04FC4AEFC787F453A0B9B9F1D81B34822493610BB60D2B79B8EF4C2F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720555443313873244

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1720767738098921959
  • noteId - 1720767738098921959
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 772A1C7B04FC4AEFC787F453A0B9B9F1D81B34822493610BB60D2B79B8EF4C2F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699097973740
  • tweetId - 1720555443313873244
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • LCOE is slechts een component van de kosten van stroom. "The LCOE (levelized cost of electricity) should not be used alone to show the economic feasibility of nuclear power." "Nuclear power reduces the hourly electricity prices by 16% on average in 2050." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266679242200021X

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-04 11:39:33 UTC
(1699097973740)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-05 00:41:56 UTC
(1699144916529)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-04 17:12:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 12:57:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 07:23:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-05 12:51:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 08:20:51 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 07:42:02 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 04:33:23 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-06 04:17:40 -0600 Rating Details