Birdwatch Note
2023-11-04 10:13:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Una futurible ley de amnistía no tiene por qué ser manifiestamente inconstitucional. Si su trámite es de proposición de ley irá vía Congreso, Senado y ratificación del Jefe de Estado. Luego, en todo caso, se pronunciaría el TC https://www.newtral.es/amnistia-proposicion-ley/20231102/
Written by ABD75F2D82C78FAC13013158CFF56FFE07E5A45A089FCF4A455F54E6706AE884
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720471279776440639
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1720746055782821908
- noteId - 1720746055782821908
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - ABD75F2D82C78FAC13013158CFF56FFE07E5A45A089FCF4A455F54E6706AE884 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1699092804270
- tweetId - 1720471279776440639
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Una futurible ley de amnistía no tiene por qué ser manifiestamente inconstitucional. Si su trámite es de proposición de ley irá vía Congreso, Senado y ratificación del Jefe de Estado. Luego, en todo caso, se pronunciaría el TC https://www.newtral.es/amnistia-proposicion-ley/20231102/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-11-04 10:13:24 UTC (1699092804270) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-05 00:41:56 UTC (1699144916529) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-11-04 18:55:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 17:59:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 09:17:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 08:09:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 08:09:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 08:01:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 07:29:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:46:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:33:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:23:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:15:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:12:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:06:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 06:00:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:46:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:32:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:29:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:27:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:26:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-04 05:16:54 -0500 | Rating Details |