Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-03 22:59:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN the OP is being argumentative, but well within artistic license. It is a response to Fan Art that depicts Link in a multitude of relationships. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_(The_Legend_of_Zelda)#:~:text=Although%20Link%20is%20a%20male,more%20of%20a%20feminine%20touch. The link above reinforces the OP statement.

Written by 3AA0AB9E948BADDB857C881B0CF6FC6062BCBA86E2236C7A749ABF22A9EF41FB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719729917410136230

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1720576367727620168
  • noteId - 1720576367727620168
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3AA0AB9E948BADDB857C881B0CF6FC6062BCBA86E2236C7A749ABF22A9EF41FB Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699052347485
  • tweetId - 1719729917410136230
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN the OP is being argumentative, but well within artistic license. It is a response to Fan Art that depicts Link in a multitude of relationships. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_(The_Legend_of_Zelda)#:~:text=Although%20Link%20is%20a%20male,more%20of%20a%20feminine%20touch. The link above reinforces the OP statement.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-03 22:59:07 UTC
(1699052347485)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC
(1699067056450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-03 18:59:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 18:37:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 18:35:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 18:14:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 18:02:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 18:45:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 16:03:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 14:28:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 14:24:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 11:05:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 07:09:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 07:06:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 06:45:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 06:39:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 05:00:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 03:17:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 22:06:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 20:51:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 20:47:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 20:06:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 20:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 19:50:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 19:34:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-06 22:32:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-10 00:13:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-29 15:45:57 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-29 06:16:54 -0600 Rating Details