Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-03 17:15:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - opinion and speculation "pulling a Boebert" doesnt have a clear definition.

Written by 274EAA90F7D2FC45ECD5C7D48BF9ED7856F97D8FE80B82010890AB3101F46CFA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720155320360603803

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1720489815051763926
  • noteId - 1720489815051763926
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 274EAA90F7D2FC45ECD5C7D48BF9ED7856F97D8FE80B82010890AB3101F46CFA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1699031711729
  • tweetId - 1720155320360603803
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - opinion and speculation "pulling a Boebert" doesnt have a clear definition.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-03 17:15:11 UTC
(1699031711729)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC
(1699067056450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-03 13:08:58 -0500 Rating Details