Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-02 16:37:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is false that "emulation is illegal". While companies like Sony make this claim, they always fail in court. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Connectix_Corp. What is illegal is distributing copyrighted software/games, which is what this post’s author is doing in the comments.

Written by 278E2A9DEB47014A0ECA0D25260F32B4BBBCA6921669422477242CF23659AB79
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720078812044755044

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1720117840835985880
  • noteId - 1720117840835985880
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 278E2A9DEB47014A0ECA0D25260F32B4BBBCA6921669422477242CF23659AB79 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698943026153
  • tweetId - 1720078812044755044
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • It is false that "emulation is illegal". While companies like Sony make this claim, they always fail in court. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Connectix_Corp. What is illegal is distributing copyrighted software/games, which is what this post’s author is doing in the comments.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-02 16:37:06 UTC
(1698943026153)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC
(1699067056450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-02 12:41:18 -0500 Rating Details