Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-02 16:35:41 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The IDF has used only conventional munitions in Gaza. There is no equivalence between conventional munitions and nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are indiscriminate and generate radiation, a thermal blast, a massive fireball, and radioactive fallout. https://www.icanw.org/catastrophic_harm

Written by 11A7AB520030E2E83DB9C51AEC7DCCAE7794F8CF95F5FCDA680D781B1E9BB2A1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1720112171126866177

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1720117486237130940
  • noteId - 1720117486237130940
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 11A7AB520030E2E83DB9C51AEC7DCCAE7794F8CF95F5FCDA680D781B1E9BB2A1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698942941613
  • tweetId - 1720112171126866177
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The IDF has used only conventional munitions in Gaza. There is no equivalence between conventional munitions and nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are indiscriminate and generate radiation, a thermal blast, a massive fireball, and radioactive fallout. https://www.icanw.org/catastrophic_harm

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-02 16:35:41 UTC
(1698942941613)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-04 03:04:16 UTC
(1699067056450)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-03 13:43:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 11:19:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 11:15:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 11:03:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 10:57:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 10:35:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 10:14:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 10:02:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 09:12:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 08:49:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 08:03:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 07:53:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 06:51:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 02:08:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 00:11:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 23:41:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 22:14:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 19:32:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 13:12:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 12:36:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 12:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 12:00:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 00:05:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 22:18:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 20:49:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-06 08:51:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-15 17:15:25 -0600 Rating Details