Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-11-01 09:35:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

原告の主張のうち、Stability AIに対する直接的著作権侵害の申し立ては棄却されていません。 > The motions to dismiss are GRANTED in full, except for the direct copyright infringement claim asserted by plaintiff Anderson against Stability. p. 28 ll. 4-5 https://www.scribd.com/document/681174239/Order-on-motion-to-dismiss https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/artists-copyright-infringement-case-ai-art-generators-1235632929/#:~:text=Notably%2C%20a%20claim%20for%20direct%20infringement%20against%20Stability%20AI%20was%20allowed%20to%20proceed%20based%20on%20allegations%20the%20company%20used%20copyrighted%20images%20without%20permission%20to%20create%20Stable%20Diffusion.

Written by A61EA1D447CE5365AE41C9B0A7A18E7294FE8C6BECBB182ACBAD93A00A2D0307
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719233067414323484

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719649230363734219
  • noteId - 1719649230363734219
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A61EA1D447CE5365AE41C9B0A7A18E7294FE8C6BECBB182ACBAD93A00A2D0307 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698831300714
  • tweetId - 1719233067414323484
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 原告の主張のうち、Stability AIに対する直接的著作権侵害の申し立ては棄却されていません。 > The motions to dismiss are GRANTED in full, except for the direct copyright infringement claim asserted by plaintiff Anderson against Stability. p. 28 ll. 4-5 https://www.scribd.com/document/681174239/Order-on-motion-to-dismiss https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/artists-copyright-infringement-case-ai-art-generators-1235632929/#:~:text=Notably%2C%20a%20claim%20for%20direct%20infringement%20against%20Stability%20AI%20was%20allowed%20to%20proceed%20based%20on%20allegations%20the%20company%20used%20copyrighted%20images%20without%20permission%20to%20create%20Stable%20Diffusion.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-11-01 09:35:00 UTC
(1698831300714)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-02 07:47:06 UTC
(1698911226426)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-11-01 06:28:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 05:54:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 06:56:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 08:33:27 -0500 Rating Details