Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-31 17:39:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Additional context from the study: "Vaccination is suggested to protect against COVID-19, since the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion remains extremely low. There's a lack of definite causation between retinal vascular occlusion and vaccinations" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

Written by 0976AD888595875CB5738EE06917EEF174388EF905C0FB56E917C17C41E064C1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719360682280309238

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719408883196662035
  • noteId - 1719408883196662035
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 0976AD888595875CB5738EE06917EEF174388EF905C0FB56E917C17C41E064C1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698773997482
  • tweetId - 1719360682280309238
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Additional context from the study: "Vaccination is suggested to protect against COVID-19, since the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion remains extremely low. There's a lack of definite causation between retinal vascular occlusion and vaccinations" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-31 17:39:57 UTC
(1698773997482)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-11-01 04:16:25 UTC
(1698812185188)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-31 15:02:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:45:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:35:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:31:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:29:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:55:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:47:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:46:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:42:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:41:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:41:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:40:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 06:20:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 05:38:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 02:14:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 23:25:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 06:01:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 18:30:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:05:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:25:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:00:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:53:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:38:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:29:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:29:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:24:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:20:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:03:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:40:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:08:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:55:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:51:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:49:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:47:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:45:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-12-30 15:00:58 -0600 Rating Details