Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-31 17:13:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN the post doesn't claim that the device that shot the video is not an iphone, but most people would think by how it's put that it was shot with only iphone and as the photo shows, really expensive custom lenses and gigs for stability where used making the claim milseading.

Written by 7FAC605A97987E760438DE1ABD5E896E24ADD0E9DC15337AAEE2CB18BB203C5A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719172621441610130

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719402203352367325
  • noteId - 1719402203352367325
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7FAC605A97987E760438DE1ABD5E896E24ADD0E9DC15337AAEE2CB18BB203C5A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698772404883
  • tweetId - 1719172621441610130
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN the post doesn't claim that the device that shot the video is not an iphone, but most people would think by how it's put that it was shot with only iphone and as the photo shows, really expensive custom lenses and gigs for stability where used making the claim milseading.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-31 17:13:24 UTC
(1698772404883)
2023-11-01 01:55:39 UTC
(1698803739107)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-01 04:16:25 UTC
(1698812185188)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-11-01 01:55:39 UTC
(1698803739107)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-31 19:59:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 18:57:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 18:17:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:22:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:08:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:03:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:01:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:26:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:57:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:54:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:33:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:29:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:21:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 15:00:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:45:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:28:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 20:44:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 20:33:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 21:01:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 20:56:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 19:28:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 18:59:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:05:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:51:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:45:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:41:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:37:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 14:02:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:54:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 13:34:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 12:31:01 -0500 Rating Details