Birdwatch Note
2023-10-31 04:07:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. This is already explained.
Written by 9B45C9F332ED28D42E40313FDBDA1C375C43F071EFE5D558A5465A4B40F811D0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718841964009848932
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1719204403318526345
- noteId - 1719204403318526345
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 9B45C9F332ED28D42E40313FDBDA1C375C43F071EFE5D558A5465A4B40F811D0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698725245677
- tweetId - 1718841964009848932
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. This is already explained.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-31 04:07:25 UTC (1698725245677) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-11-01 04:16:25 UTC (1698812185188) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-31 04:46:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-31 19:03:33 -0500 | Rating Details |