Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-30 22:15:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Senate procedural rules mean holding individual up or down votes on nominees one-by-one isn't actually feasible. The proposed"work-around" is like saying Congress should pass daily 24-hr CRs to keep the government open. It would take all their time and inevitably fail

Written by 633D2413AC74205A72C8A6B008ED0FA327768866AF8D24E45D436AF4314F3AD6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1719078409240707444

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1719115824487915728
  • noteId - 1719115824487915728
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 633D2413AC74205A72C8A6B008ED0FA327768866AF8D24E45D436AF4314F3AD6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698704126840
  • tweetId - 1719078409240707444
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Senate procedural rules mean holding individual up or down votes on nominees one-by-one isn't actually feasible. The proposed"work-around" is like saying Congress should pass daily 24-hr CRs to keep the government open. It would take all their time and inevitably fail

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-30 22:15:26 UTC
(1698704126840)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-31 02:56:10 UTC
(1698720970410)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-30 18:37:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 17:40:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 17:23:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 17:08:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:27:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 10:43:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 10:05:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 09:55:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 02:28:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 22:22:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:57:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:20:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 19:40:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 19:35:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 04:16:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 08:57:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 16:21:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 00:57:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 22:19:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 22:00:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:59:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:15:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:08:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 21:02:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 20:55:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 20:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 20:39:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 19:28:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 18:36:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 18:09:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 17:33:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 17:28:15 -0500 Rating Details