Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-30 09:54:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Neexistuje studie, dle které by zásah expanzní střelou v 99% případů znamenal smrt. Naopak existuje studie z Ruso-Ukrajinského konfliktu, kde po zásahu expanzní střelou do oblasti tlustého střeva zemřelo 35% subjektů, oproti 13% po zásahu solidní střelou. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883919/

Written by 158AEC6F9A3B4D2CC668909FCFEC948F1D2FF3D3477F15E6EF499DCBDCDF3EEE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718720159710372125

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1718929247467639192
  • noteId - 1718929247467639192
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 158AEC6F9A3B4D2CC668909FCFEC948F1D2FF3D3477F15E6EF499DCBDCDF3EEE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698659643412
  • tweetId - 1718720159710372125
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Neexistuje studie, dle které by zásah expanzní střelou v 99% případů znamenal smrt. Naopak existuje studie z Ruso-Ukrajinského konfliktu, kde po zásahu expanzní střelou do oblasti tlustého střeva zemřelo 35% subjektů, oproti 13% po zásahu solidní střelou. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883919/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-30 09:54:03 UTC
(1698659643412)
2023-10-30 17:52:53 UTC
(1698688373155)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-31 02:56:10 UTC
(1698720970410)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-10-30 17:52:53 UTC
(1698688373155)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-30 17:28:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 16:00:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 13:04:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 10:15:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 10:01:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 09:11:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:51:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:51:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:10:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:05:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:52:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:15:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 16:23:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-01 04:10:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 01:00:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 16:31:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 14:50:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 14:47:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 13:36:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 12:11:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 12:08:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 11:04:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:59:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:05:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:51:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:39:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:55:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:46:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-24 17:20:47 -0600 Rating Details