Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-30 07:53:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Les auteurs de l'étude expliquent que le risque accru ne limite en rien les bénéfices des deux vaccins et que les données utilisées sont incomplètes et qu'aucune conclusion ne peut être tirée à ce stade https://abcnews.go.com/Health/flu-covid-shot-reasonable-amid-safety-review-potential/story?id=104308950

Written by DA6669BA905643E17A0E57EE5B0B84B16DDBC09DE9D9BFB67B822B82F3F38F1A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718894964006920669

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1718898804185874545
  • noteId - 1718898804185874545
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DA6669BA905643E17A0E57EE5B0B84B16DDBC09DE9D9BFB67B822B82F3F38F1A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698652385169
  • tweetId - 1718894964006920669
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Les auteurs de l'étude expliquent que le risque accru ne limite en rien les bénéfices des deux vaccins et que les données utilisées sont incomplètes et qu'aucune conclusion ne peut être tirée à ce stade https://abcnews.go.com/Health/flu-covid-shot-reasonable-amid-safety-review-potential/story?id=104308950

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-30 07:53:05 UTC
(1698652385169)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-10-31 02:56:10 UTC
(1698720970410)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-30 13:10:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 11:35:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 09:58:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 09:52:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 07:33:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:56:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:32:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:01:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:45:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:06:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:05:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:57:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:49:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:40:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:26:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:18:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:07:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 10:24:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 23:15:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 23:58:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-02 05:38:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-31 03:56:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 14:28:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 12:10:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 08:50:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 08:41:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 08:31:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:28:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:17:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:25:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:47:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:27:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 02:57:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 02:55:55 -0500 Rating Details