Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-30 03:43:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NNN Just because an algorithm targets anyone who gets called out by CN doesn’t mean it’s racist if the person it calls out happens to be black. Don’t use irrelevant sources and logic to support an non-factual claim. CN is not racist. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

Written by BED632A0A265122A8FAAAB8EBF4C2976A1A7C24649C7C8BCF1ABCEFBB263769D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718797125340074016

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1718836077329625411
  • noteId - 1718836077329625411
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BED632A0A265122A8FAAAB8EBF4C2976A1A7C24649C7C8BCF1ABCEFBB263769D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698637429924
  • tweetId - 1718797125340074016
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN Just because an algorithm targets anyone who gets called out by CN doesn’t mean it’s racist if the person it calls out happens to be black. Don’t use irrelevant sources and logic to support an non-factual claim. CN is not racist. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-30 03:43:49 UTC
(1698637429924)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-31 02:56:10 UTC
(1698720970410)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-30 10:11:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 08:14:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:35:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:19:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:51:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 03:06:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 02:38:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:56:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:52:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:42:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:01:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 00:34:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 00:15:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 23:36:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 23:10:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 22:52:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 22:49:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 18:39:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:28:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:27:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 06:23:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 02:59:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:52:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 01:17:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 00:45:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 00:29:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 23:45:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 23:29:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 22:56:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 05:37:10 -0500 Rating Details