Birdwatch Note
2023-10-29 19:47:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is factually incorrect, the levelised cost of energy (LCOE) for wind & solar is much lower than for conventional energy generation technologies. There is substantial peer reviewed scientific and economic evidence supporting this. See https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/145Country/22-145Countries.pdf And Deutsche Bank analysis https://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/RPS_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000528292/Costs_of_electricity_generation%3A_System_costs_matt.PDF
Written by BB71AABDD62A191F94FDC9A395488880D394D682864AE738869DA5857095A2E1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1718708902739546585
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1718716239130886157
- noteId - 1718716239130886157
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BB71AABDD62A191F94FDC9A395488880D394D682864AE738869DA5857095A2E1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698608858273
- tweetId - 1718708902739546585
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is factually incorrect, the levelised cost of energy (LCOE) for wind & solar is much lower than for conventional energy generation technologies. There is substantial peer reviewed scientific and economic evidence supporting this. See https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/145Country/22-145Countries.pdf And Deutsche Bank analysis https://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/RPS_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000528292/Costs_of_electricity_generation%3A_System_costs_matt.PDF
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-29 19:47:38 UTC (1698608858273) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-30 02:46:32 UTC (1698633992867) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-30 03:40:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-29 15:03:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-29 15:48:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-29 15:32:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-29 15:00:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-29 14:55:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-16 21:32:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-26 07:10:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-11-23 01:37:30 -0600 | Rating Details |