Birdwatch Note
2023-10-28 09:55:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Messi didn’t win the league for PSG. While PSG gained three crucial points in this game, it wouldn't be accurate to claim that this single match was the reason they won the league, since this game was played in February https://www.fotmob.com/it/matches/lille-vs-paris-saint-germain/2tqnus#3904483
Written by 1F5D3400741FE7B2B690AD4F7F1DD4BDB15B771E0F26C4E1F22EB8EB4D009A12
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715726519023346160
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1718204942907740544
- noteId - 1718204942907740544
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1F5D3400741FE7B2B690AD4F7F1DD4BDB15B771E0F26C4E1F22EB8EB4D009A12 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698486955748
- tweetId - 1715726519023346160
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Messi didn’t win the league for PSG. While PSG gained three crucial points in this game, it wouldn't be accurate to claim that this single match was the reason they won the league, since this game was played in February https://www.fotmob.com/it/matches/lille-vs-paris-saint-germain/2tqnus#3904483
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-28 09:55:55 UTC (1698486955748) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-29 01:53:18 UTC (1698544398431) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-28 09:08:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 09:06:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:27:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:13:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 06:42:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 06:20:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 05:42:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 05:00:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 16:11:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 15:40:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 13:48:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 09:48:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 09:46:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:37:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:35:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:31:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:28:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 07:28:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 06:25:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 05:41:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 05:35:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 05:30:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 19:59:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 10:52:23 -0500 | Rating Details |