Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-26 23:36:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El propio enlace contradice su afirmación. No fue por ninguna denuncia si no que fueron urnas que no se llegaron a contabilizar. https://www.lapoliticaonline.com/congreso/unac-gana-un-senador-mas-en-el-escrutinio-definitivo-y-el-peronismo-tendria-quorum-propio/

Written by C033E11CAE4EFCC2D5306B938AD7C8F9CA63A9351C2FFFD6C2A75E459CB18693
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717589703078109210

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717686702666301843
  • noteId - 1717686702666301843
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C033E11CAE4EFCC2D5306B938AD7C8F9CA63A9351C2FFFD6C2A75E459CB18693 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698363397653
  • tweetId - 1717589703078109210
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El propio enlace contradice su afirmación. No fue por ninguna denuncia si no que fueron urnas que no se llegaron a contabilizar. https://www.lapoliticaonline.com/congreso/unac-gana-un-senador-mas-en-el-escrutinio-definitivo-y-el-peronismo-tendria-quorum-propio/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-26 23:36:37 UTC
(1698363397653)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC
(1698382288906)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-26 19:31:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:28:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:19:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:13:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 18:55:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 18:42:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 17:21:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 09:50:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 09:15:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 08:54:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 07:45:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 05:53:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 23:32:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 22:18:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 22:03:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 21:40:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 21:35:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 21:01:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 20:02:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:59:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 11:52:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 11:51:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 10:47:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 09:51:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 09:47:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 07:36:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 06:31:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 04:51:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 04:33:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 03:28:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 03:05:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 02:27:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 20:44:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 20:26:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 20:04:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:49:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:26:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:19:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:16:38 -0500 Rating Details