Birdwatch Note
2023-10-26 16:51:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
La communauté scientifique (en particulier plusieurs auteurs du GIEC) soutient l’opposition au projet de l’A69 et demande au gouvernement d’y renoncer. https://www.nouvelobs.com/ecologie/20231004.OBS79024/pour-nous-scientifiques-l-autoroute-a69-est-un-de-ces-projets-auxquels-il-faut-renoncer.html
Written by B1765060214D3FA48DE6F51AB9002CC19DBDE4D2BBD132849B4B5A95B0948555
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717235119365542382
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1717584682626187492
- noteId - 1717584682626187492
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B1765060214D3FA48DE6F51AB9002CC19DBDE4D2BBD132849B4B5A95B0948555 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698339074172
- tweetId - 1717235119365542382
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- La communauté scientifique (en particulier plusieurs auteurs du GIEC) soutient l’opposition au projet de l’A69 et demande au gouvernement d’y renoncer. https://www.nouvelobs.com/ecologie/20231004.OBS79024/pour-nous-scientifiques-l-autoroute-a69-est-un-de-ces-projets-auxquels-il-faut-renoncer.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-26 16:51:14 UTC (1698339074172) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC (1698382288906) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-26 17:24:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 16:25:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 15:01:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 14:11:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 14:04:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:39:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:21:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 12:42:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 12:08:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 02:10:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-27 17:15:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-27 01:27:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-27 00:06:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-30 02:31:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-28 02:01:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-27 01:22:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-27 00:25:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 20:08:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 16:57:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 16:32:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 16:10:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 14:24:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:51:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:42:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:26:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 13:11:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 12:44:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-26 12:35:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-22 08:55:58 -0500 | Rating Details |