Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-26 16:51:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

La communauté scientifique (en particulier plusieurs auteurs du GIEC) soutient l’opposition au projet de l’A69 et demande au gouvernement d’y renoncer. https://www.nouvelobs.com/ecologie/20231004.OBS79024/pour-nous-scientifiques-l-autoroute-a69-est-un-de-ces-projets-auxquels-il-faut-renoncer.html

Written by B1765060214D3FA48DE6F51AB9002CC19DBDE4D2BBD132849B4B5A95B0948555
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717235119365542382

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717584682626187492
  • noteId - 1717584682626187492
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B1765060214D3FA48DE6F51AB9002CC19DBDE4D2BBD132849B4B5A95B0948555 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698339074172
  • tweetId - 1717235119365542382
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • La communauté scientifique (en particulier plusieurs auteurs du GIEC) soutient l’opposition au projet de l’A69 et demande au gouvernement d’y renoncer. https://www.nouvelobs.com/ecologie/20231004.OBS79024/pour-nous-scientifiques-l-autoroute-a69-est-un-de-ces-projets-auxquels-il-faut-renoncer.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-26 16:51:14 UTC
(1698339074172)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC
(1698382288906)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-26 17:24:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 16:25:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 15:01:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 14:11:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 14:04:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:39:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:21:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:42:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:08:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-28 02:10:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 17:15:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 01:27:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 00:06:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 02:31:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-28 02:01:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 01:22:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 00:25:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 20:08:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 16:57:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 16:32:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 16:10:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 14:24:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:51:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:42:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:26:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 13:11:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:44:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:35:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-22 08:55:58 -0500 Rating Details