Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-26 16:32:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The proposed note misses an important nuance: even if game prices have decreased when adjusted for inflation, it is still possible that Valve influenced game prices in a way that made games more expensive than they would have been otherwise.

Written by 956DC9C30ADDFD409AA3F1C1135D135DEF7B4ACC668C2EA5D9352E5E5F47AF52
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716824268502421635

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717580051401617569
  • noteId - 1717580051401617569
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 956DC9C30ADDFD409AA3F1C1135D135DEF7B4ACC668C2EA5D9352E5E5F47AF52 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698337970005
  • tweetId - 1716824268502421635
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The proposed note misses an important nuance: even if game prices have decreased when adjusted for inflation, it is still possible that Valve influenced game prices in a way that made games more expensive than they would have been otherwise.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-26 16:32:50 UTC
(1698337970005)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC
(1698382288906)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-26 14:49:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 12:46:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 15:28:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 14:06:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 12:39:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-03 20:05:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-05 12:29:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-04 20:37:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-06 11:33:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-05 20:19:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 17:06:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 12:36:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 10:14:46 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-07 22:29:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 17:35:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 15:44:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 23:54:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-11 18:44:14 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-12 20:23:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-16 16:18:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-16 15:19:49 -0600 Rating Details