Birdwatch Note
2023-10-26 12:49:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This information is unreliable. Because the question on gender in the 2021 census was so misleading, it seems those with English not their first language, who live disproportionately in poorer neighbourhoods, didn't understand the question. See parliamentary question https://x.com/fairplaywomen/status/1717237424479203721?s=20
Written by 5CA0B994693CFA41E60F08D0770ED96B184E9F481F7E7551AF395951D7080C00
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1709524928012112364
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1717523949695725661
- noteId - 1717523949695725661
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5CA0B994693CFA41E60F08D0770ED96B184E9F481F7E7551AF395951D7080C00 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698324594311
- tweetId - 1709524928012112364
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This information is unreliable. Because the question on gender in the 2021 census was so misleading, it seems those with English not their first language, who live disproportionately in poorer neighbourhoods, didn't understand the question. See parliamentary question https://x.com/fairplaywomen/status/1717237424479203721?s=20
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-26 12:49:54 UTC (1698324594311) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC (1698382288906) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-26 13:49:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 13:48:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 13:44:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 08:37:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 15:31:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 13:33:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-26 12:36:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-12 17:19:35 -0500 | Rating Details |