Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-26 02:17:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The proposed note cites sources stating that the recounts produced the same results as the original count. This is not disputed. The issue, which the tweet provides verified .gov evidence for, is that many of the ballots originally counted and recounted were forgeries.

Written by FE05DF5C037870CDE2654C18BCF803712C945DC1C87FC34B91038655EC40FC55
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717167051008077996

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717364807727514065
  • noteId - 1717364807727514065
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FE05DF5C037870CDE2654C18BCF803712C945DC1C87FC34B91038655EC40FC55 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698286651914
  • tweetId - 1717167051008077996
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The proposed note cites sources stating that the recounts produced the same results as the original count. This is not disputed. The issue, which the tweet provides verified .gov evidence for, is that many of the ballots originally counted and recounted were forgeries.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-26 02:17:31 UTC
(1698286651914)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-27 04:51:28 UTC
(1698382288906)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-26 17:30:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 11:58:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 11:24:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 11:01:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 07:10:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 05:29:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 04:19:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 04:09:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 03:39:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 02:36:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 01:50:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:56:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:27:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:25:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:21:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 22:39:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 22:38:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 21:19:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 06:01:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 05:57:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 05:51:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 19:40:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 07:07:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 07:32:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 18:31:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 10:24:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 09:55:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 06:25:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 05:46:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 04:10:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 02:21:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 01:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 01:44:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 01:40:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:17:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:11:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 21:38:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 18:51:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-29 10:03:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-16 13:20:03 -0500 Rating Details