Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-25 18:56:55 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

O autor do post explicou claramente que o foguete ou míssel no vídeo divulgado pela IDF não poderia ter caído no hospital conforme análise do NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/24/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-video.html Não há qualquer afirmação sobre o que efetivamente caiu no hospital.

Written by 2B50C2A6D68757F072ACA7C5671EFEC5E056A1E50669983C4D5B0C20628F0668
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717148715910103318

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717253926460768518
  • noteId - 1717253926460768518
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2B50C2A6D68757F072ACA7C5671EFEC5E056A1E50669983C4D5B0C20628F0668 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698260215755
  • tweetId - 1717148715910103318
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • O autor do post explicou claramente que o foguete ou míssel no vídeo divulgado pela IDF não poderia ter caído no hospital conforme análise do NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/24/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-video.html Não há qualquer afirmação sobre o que efetivamente caiu no hospital.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-25 18:56:55 UTC
(1698260215755)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-26 05:05:11 UTC
(1698296711934)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-25 17:37:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:58:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:34:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:24:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:49:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:39:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 14:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 14:10:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 17:56:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 07:11:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:31:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:22:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:19:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:16:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 20:03:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-27 07:26:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-30 04:43:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 11:04:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 07:04:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 04:36:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:12:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 23:35:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 22:24:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 22:18:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 21:13:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 19:46:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 18:28:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 17:59:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 17:25:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:44:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:34:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:12:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:03:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:47:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:44:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:29:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 15:10:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 14:39:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-28 20:39:24 -0500 Rating Details