Birdwatch Note
2023-10-25 16:16:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It is not currently possible to predict earthquakes like this http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/en/knowledge/snapshots/earthquake-prophets/ https://www.egu.eu/sm/can-we-predict-earthquakes/ https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230213-the-uncertain-science-of-predicting-earthquakes Organizations that scientifically evaluate forecasts have yet to receive any method that passes basic statistical tests https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/national-earthquake-prediction-evaluation-council-nepec https://cseptesting.org/ Supposed predictions are a common online scam https://www.wired.com/2012/04/the-fraudulent-business-of-earthquake-and-eruption-prediction/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies
Written by B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717075859637489689
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1717213658466431136
- noteId - 1717213658466431136
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698250615123
- tweetId - 1717075859637489689
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It is not currently possible to predict earthquakes like this http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/en/knowledge/snapshots/earthquake-prophets/ https://www.egu.eu/sm/can-we-predict-earthquakes/ https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230213-the-uncertain-science-of-predicting-earthquakes Organizations that scientifically evaluate forecasts have yet to receive any method that passes basic statistical tests https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/national-earthquake-prediction-evaluation-council-nepec https://cseptesting.org/ Supposed predictions are a common online scam https://www.wired.com/2012/04/the-fraudulent-business-of-earthquake-and-eruption-prediction/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-25 16:16:55 UTC (1698250615123) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-26 05:05:11 UTC (1698296711934) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-25 15:56:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 14:37:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 14:32:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 14:31:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 14:22:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 12:14:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 11:21:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 16:49:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 15:10:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 14:17:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 13:40:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-25 11:24:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-03 21:44:54 -0500 | Rating Details |