Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-25 10:27:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

People keep saying there is no evidence babies were beheaded. This is simply NOT true. Here is an interview with a doctor who takes pains to separate victims whose heads were blown off and children (girls) who he thinks were beheaded. 3 min https://youtu.be/6qnZfdzO7kY?si=L12IkRxN4TvaE8P5

Written by 55B16E93A926AECD752B5ACAB8C4A5FFDC5247E5A3B77D815C926F82D485CAC8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1717116937828811252

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1717125799059595772
  • noteId - 1717125799059595772
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 55B16E93A926AECD752B5ACAB8C4A5FFDC5247E5A3B77D815C926F82D485CAC8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1698229667809
  • tweetId - 1717116937828811252
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • People keep saying there is no evidence babies were beheaded. This is simply NOT true. Here is an interview with a doctor who takes pains to separate victims whose heads were blown off and children (girls) who he thinks were beheaded. 3 min https://youtu.be/6qnZfdzO7kY?si=L12IkRxN4TvaE8P5

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-25 10:27:47 UTC
(1698229667809)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-26 05:05:11 UTC
(1698296711934)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-25 14:58:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 12:22:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 11:26:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:41:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:31:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:55:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:34:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 06:50:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:41:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 08:42:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-26 00:27:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 17:55:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 16:51:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 13:01:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 10:29:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:57:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:55:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:52:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:41:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 08:41:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:44:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 07:44:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 06:34:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 06:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:47:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:43:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-25 05:36:27 -0500 Rating Details