Birdwatch Note
2023-10-24 16:24:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
“The UK’s top financial regulators argued against the ban when it was introduced, and since leaving the EU the government has claimed its removal will increase the post-Brexit competitiveness of the City by making London a more attractive place for banks to base their staff”. https://www.ft.com/content/cc419caf-213d-418e-b921-90e80c7a114b
Written by 1AFFEF770991C7DD530801B73D2C065B492571B191EF1E17F7ACE2F110CB1521
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716798139716251913
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1716853262953984497
- noteId - 1716853262953984497
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1AFFEF770991C7DD530801B73D2C065B492571B191EF1E17F7ACE2F110CB1521 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698164690133
- tweetId - 1716798139716251913
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- “The UK’s top financial regulators argued against the ban when it was introduced, and since leaving the EU the government has claimed its removal will increase the post-Brexit competitiveness of the City by making London a more attractive place for banks to base their staff”. https://www.ft.com/content/cc419caf-213d-418e-b921-90e80c7a114b
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-24 16:24:50 UTC (1698164690133) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-25 03:44:26 UTC (1698205466778) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-24 19:28:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 18:18:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 16:20:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 16:04:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 15:42:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 15:38:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 13:16:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:29:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:17:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:08:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:59:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:55:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:50:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:43:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:39:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 01:46:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 01:12:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 22:10:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 19:57:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 06:41:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 02:54:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 17:48:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 16:20:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 15:18:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 14:51:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 14:10:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 14:02:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 13:08:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:56:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:55:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 12:48:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:34:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 11:31:59 -0500 | Rating Details |