Birdwatch Note
2023-10-24 11:29:05 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Contractors love to throw in R & D, Tooling, Non Recurring Engr Fine but that weapon system has many parts that have been built for 30 + years Savings: Engineering/Components built & supported for years? NO Bottom line: Fielding 1300 units for over 400K is embarrassing https://www.axios.com/2022/05/28/us-awards-replenish-stinger-stock-ukraine
Written by 0B4DE016128739C355DAEA1EF17F58BBC66AF4E6B89B23097C5AF1756D35DF52
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716439605103165725
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1716778835348250950
- noteId - 1716778835348250950
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0B4DE016128739C355DAEA1EF17F58BBC66AF4E6B89B23097C5AF1756D35DF52 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698146945210
- tweetId - 1716439605103165725
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Contractors love to throw in R & D, Tooling, Non Recurring Engr Fine but that weapon system has many parts that have been built for 30 + years Savings: Engineering/Components built & supported for years? NO Bottom line: Fielding 1300 units for over 400K is embarrassing https://www.axios.com/2022/05/28/us-awards-replenish-stinger-stock-ukraine
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-24 11:29:05 UTC (1698146945210) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-25 03:44:26 UTC (1698205466778) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-24 09:18:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 08:04:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 08:03:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 07:42:38 -0500 | Rating Details |