Birdwatch Note
2023-10-23 13:38:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
These claims by this user have been fact-checked as false by geophysicists many times over the last decade: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-earthquake-prediction-262451352553 https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154893886/earthquake-prediction-turkey-usgs https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/28/massive-california-earthquake-predicted-for-today/ https://slate.com/technology/2015/05/planetary-alignment-no-it-won-t-cause-an-earthquake.html https://gizmodo.com/will-a-planetary-alignment-cause-a-9-8-earthquake-this-1706933982 https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/01/man-s-huge-quake-prediction-is-fearmongering-geonet.html No earthquake predictions/forecasts like these have ever been found to be effective: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/national-earthquake-prediction-evaluation-council-nepec https://cseptesting.org/
Written by 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716380124067611061
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1716449124759838891
- noteId - 1716449124759838891
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1698068336084
- tweetId - 1716380124067611061
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- These claims by this user have been fact-checked as false by geophysicists many times over the last decade: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-earthquake-prediction-262451352553 https://www.npr.org/2023/02/07/1154893886/earthquake-prediction-turkey-usgs https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/28/massive-california-earthquake-predicted-for-today/ https://slate.com/technology/2015/05/planetary-alignment-no-it-won-t-cause-an-earthquake.html https://gizmodo.com/will-a-planetary-alignment-cause-a-9-8-earthquake-this-1706933982 https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/01/man-s-huge-quake-prediction-is-fearmongering-geonet.html No earthquake predictions/forecasts like these have ever been found to be effective: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00685-y https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake https://www.usgs.gov/programs/earthquake-hazards/national-earthquake-prediction-evaluation-council-nepec https://cseptesting.org/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-23 13:38:56 UTC (1698068336084) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-24 04:15:48 UTC (1698120948664) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-23 14:31:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 14:09:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 14:07:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 13:16:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 12:57:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 12:13:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 11:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 10:28:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 10:24:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:39:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:36:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:33:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:27:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 08:46:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 07:17:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 05:07:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 05:02:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 05:36:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 04:48:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 03:58:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 13:59:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 13:55:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 13:47:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 13:28:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 11:41:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:51:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:49:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:42:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:15:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:14:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:14:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 09:08:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 08:51:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 08:48:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-05-22 22:22:56 -0500 | Rating Details |