Birdwatch Note
2023-10-22 17:42:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The U.K. Ministry of Defense reported a 90% increase in Russian casualties at Avdiivka, not a 90% casualty rate: https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1715968466501472576 This information from the MoD is sourced from Ukrainian estimates. However, these estimates have in the past been almost twice as high as the actual numbers: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2307372120
Written by 5E58211500BCE4033CC7CB86CBDC4C96E5ED5FFFC9B49617C0A4CC69D1F83BAE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1716039759762428191
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1716148016866853341
- noteId - 1716148016866853341
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E58211500BCE4033CC7CB86CBDC4C96E5ED5FFFC9B49617C0A4CC69D1F83BAE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697996546366
- tweetId - 1716039759762428191
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The U.K. Ministry of Defense reported a 90% increase in Russian casualties at Avdiivka, not a 90% casualty rate: https://twitter.com/DefenceHQ/status/1715968466501472576 This information from the MoD is sourced from Ukrainian estimates. However, these estimates have in the past been almost twice as high as the actual numbers: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2307372120
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-22 17:42:26 UTC (1697996546366) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-23 04:39:02 UTC (1698035942538) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-22 18:35:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 16:53:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 14:20:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 13:19:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 13:06:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 12:56:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 12:49:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 16:18:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 16:16:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 13:42:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 13:21:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-22 12:46:09 -0500 | Rating Details |