Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-22 14:34:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN This 𝕏 account is clearly sharing an opinion about an official page of George Floyd's autopsy report. The first page of the autopsy report does not negate from the findings from the second page. https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/medical-examiner/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf

Written by 7F770A456AB819CC65907887FCCD4662BAC5D2A7589C0322C99E971FEEF06165
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715913077047050299

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1716100646980468857
  • noteId - 1716100646980468857
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7F770A456AB819CC65907887FCCD4662BAC5D2A7589C0322C99E971FEEF06165 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697985252501
  • tweetId - 1715913077047050299
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN This 𝕏 account is clearly sharing an opinion about an official page of George Floyd's autopsy report. The first page of the autopsy report does not negate from the findings from the second page. https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/medical-examiner/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-22 14:34:12 UTC
(1697985252501)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-23 04:39:02 UTC
(1698035942538)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-22 15:33:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 15:16:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 14:27:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:49:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:45:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:37:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:12:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:06:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:39:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:07:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:55:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:52:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:48:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:43:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 10:46:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 10:43:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 10:10:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-24 06:44:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 19:22:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 17:16:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 17:00:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 16:58:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 16:29:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 16:03:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 15:40:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:27:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:13:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:08:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:57:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:48:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:30:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:22:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 10:56:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 09:44:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-01-16 17:08:42 -0600 Rating Details