Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-22 14:12:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no such thing as a "Jihadist flag". Various groups use the Black Standard with the Shahada inscribed upon it, including non-Jihadists. The Wikipedia page being quoted has a talk section where contributors discuss this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jihadist_flag#Disputed

Written by 7C4D9BB3616C082DA5903964F772A44C493F2E5DDF89405C94A2E11D28478266
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715787302637646321

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1716095290984276465
  • noteId - 1716095290984276465
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7C4D9BB3616C082DA5903964F772A44C493F2E5DDF89405C94A2E11D28478266 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697983975533
  • tweetId - 1715787302637646321
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no such thing as a "Jihadist flag". Various groups use the Black Standard with the Shahada inscribed upon it, including non-Jihadists. The Wikipedia page being quoted has a talk section where contributors discuss this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jihadist_flag#Disputed

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-22 14:12:55 UTC
(1697983975533)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-23 04:39:02 UTC
(1698035942538)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-22 16:04:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:41:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:08:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 10:06:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 11:43:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 10:47:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 09:11:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 04:42:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 00:36:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 22:05:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 15:02:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 13:49:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 09:13:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 02:53:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 16:20:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 16:16:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 14:01:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:23:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 13:12:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:52:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 12:16:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:40:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:33:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 11:26:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 09:57:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 09:26:53 -0500 Rating Details