Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-22 00:59:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The note has changed its status to "Needs more qualifications" and is only visible to collaborators of the community notes: https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1715370158036836363 This sometimes happens because the system updates a note's usefulness as other collaborators rate a note, as X(Twitter) VP Keith Coleman explains: https://twitter.com/kcoleman/status/1684233129932750848

Written by 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715702180232007920

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1715895722002825367
  • noteId - 1715895722002825367
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4517224DE6B504C79C198D4388BA1727F707B2B31A49EF9C87B328D9DB12936F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697936394588
  • tweetId - 1715702180232007920
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The note has changed its status to "Needs more qualifications" and is only visible to collaborators of the community notes: https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/t/1715370158036836363 This sometimes happens because the system updates a note's usefulness as other collaborators rate a note, as X(Twitter) VP Keith Coleman explains: https://twitter.com/kcoleman/status/1684233129932750848

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-22 00:59:54 UTC
(1697936394588)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-22 04:35:12 UTC
(1697949312335)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-22 03:57:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 00:50:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 00:00:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 04:08:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-22 01:47:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 23:17:21 -0500 Rating Details