Birdwatch Note
2023-10-21 17:20:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
La campagne qui lie consommation de viande à baisse de libido est critiquée pour son manque de preuves scientifiques, surtout chez les jeunes adultes. Le message "choc" peut sacrifier nuance et exactitude. https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/life/article/la-viande-nuit-elle-a-notre-sexualite-comme-le-pretend-peta_117664.html
Written by 7B5D36DDE01E96E48BD91AB59B436E1FDD57E8F9816217CCF4F18DE63795C9F5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715247725803868576
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1715780007237169564
- noteId - 1715780007237169564
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7B5D36DDE01E96E48BD91AB59B436E1FDD57E8F9816217CCF4F18DE63795C9F5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697908806027
- tweetId - 1715247725803868576
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- La campagne qui lie consommation de viande à baisse de libido est critiquée pour son manque de preuves scientifiques, surtout chez les jeunes adultes. Le message "choc" peut sacrifier nuance et exactitude. https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/life/article/la-viande-nuit-elle-a-notre-sexualite-comme-le-pretend-peta_117664.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-21 17:20:06 UTC (1697908806027) |
2023-10-22 00:01:58 UTC (1697932918271) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-22 04:35:12 UTC (1697949312335) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-22 00:01:58 UTC (1697932918271) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-21 16:16:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 15:10:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 14:16:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 14:00:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 17:45:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 17:00:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 16:21:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 11:12:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 02:09:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 21:27:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 02:59:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 15:12:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 11:33:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 11:03:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-23 08:56:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 16:35:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 15:12:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 13:26:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 11:36:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 10:16:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 09:57:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 08:50:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 06:10:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 02:30:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 01:46:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 01:22:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 18:15:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 17:27:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 14:35:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 13:07:51 -0500 | Rating Details |