Birdwatch Note
2023-10-21 04:29:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The statements made in the tweet are supported by a variety of studies. While it's true that LNG does produce methane and CO2, the original post doesn't claim otherwise. It simply states that it is a comparatively cleaner LNG https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/explained-why-canadian-lng-will-have-the-worlds-lowest-emissions-intensity/
Written by 40FA8668471338250A1AB216F51FD98CB106EC8852CB9437BF71C2DA7451F782
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1691894631116812349
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1715586108711735454
- noteId - 1715586108711735454
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 40FA8668471338250A1AB216F51FD98CB106EC8852CB9437BF71C2DA7451F782 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697862577023
- tweetId - 1691894631116812349
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The statements made in the tweet are supported by a variety of studies. While it's true that LNG does produce methane and CO2, the original post doesn't claim otherwise. It simply states that it is a comparatively cleaner LNG https://www.canadianenergycentre.ca/explained-why-canadian-lng-will-have-the-worlds-lowest-emissions-intensity/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-21 04:29:37 UTC (1697862577023) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-22 04:35:12 UTC (1697949312335) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-24 09:12:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 07:51:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 21:24:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-21 02:29:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-25 10:21:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 13:24:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-24 08:17:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 19:51:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 09:57:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-22 06:08:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-02 13:13:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-31 06:09:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-11-07 11:40:47 -0600 | Rating Details |