Birdwatch Note
2023-10-20 16:43:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
For this statement to be accurate, 94% and 81% of Reform Party voters would need to have otherwise voted Conservative in Tamworth and Mid Bedfordshire respectively. The linked article does not provide any evidence to support voters ‘second preference’. By-Election Results: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67145281.amp
Written by 786FEF442354C2370882CFDE304FFCF62373179E8DC6CA5902CDE7DA67526C94
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1715337110729769422
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1715408434957361468
- noteId - 1715408434957361468
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 786FEF442354C2370882CFDE304FFCF62373179E8DC6CA5902CDE7DA67526C94 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697820216296
- tweetId - 1715337110729769422
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- For this statement to be accurate, 94% and 81% of Reform Party voters would need to have otherwise voted Conservative in Tamworth and Mid Bedfordshire respectively. The linked article does not provide any evidence to support voters ‘second preference’. By-Election Results: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67145281.amp
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-20 16:43:36 UTC (1697820216296) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-21 05:52:23 UTC (1697867543645) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-20 15:51:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 13:56:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-21 07:29:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-21 04:08:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-21 04:08:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 21:39:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-21 04:51:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-21 03:37:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 22:05:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 21:14:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 20:44:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 16:45:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 15:53:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 15:42:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 15:36:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 15:07:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 12:21:18 -0500 | Rating Details |