Birdwatch Note
2023-10-20 07:42:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The post's points are factual - reasonable analysts consider the question open, and the IDF has indeed lied before . Her post also aligns with the analysis published by e.g. Channel 4 news in the UK (https://www.channel4.com/news/who-was-behind-the-gaza-hospital-blast-visual-investigation). Arguments and bits of evidence on each side belong in replies, QTs etc.
Written by 31C5B8DA492E597252529BD6D50F6F60B72F3A6B439FE7C212BD19E62A508734
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714536450723664235
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1715272330857836976
- noteId - 1715272330857836976
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 31C5B8DA492E597252529BD6D50F6F60B72F3A6B439FE7C212BD19E62A508734 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697787766556
- tweetId - 1714536450723664235
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post's points are factual - reasonable analysts consider the question open, and the IDF has indeed lied before . Her post also aligns with the analysis published by e.g. Channel 4 news in the UK (https://www.channel4.com/news/who-was-behind-the-gaza-hospital-blast-visual-investigation). Arguments and bits of evidence on each side belong in replies, QTs etc.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-20 07:42:46 UTC (1697787766556) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-21 05:52:23 UTC (1697867543645) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-20 02:54:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 02:46:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-20 04:14:12 -0500 | Rating Details |