Birdwatch Note
2023-10-19 05:42:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No próprio vídeo, demonstra-se que não foi o assessor que começou a confusão. O vídeo mostra que o Deputado Rogério Correia, não Senador, deu um tapa na mão do assessor que segurava um celular. O celular em questão acabou caindo sobre Soraya. https://www.poder360.com.br/congresso/deputado-do-pt-bateu-em-celular-que-caiu-na-cabeca-de-senadora/
Written by DF92AF9E1E88564EE8BFB8A1D0A1C1AE4B4A7AD37E05CBB02A0F581DD6D51CE5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714762340153864234
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1714879691704656069
- noteId - 1714879691704656069
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DF92AF9E1E88564EE8BFB8A1D0A1C1AE4B4A7AD37E05CBB02A0F581DD6D51CE5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697694154083
- tweetId - 1714762340153864234
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No próprio vídeo, demonstra-se que não foi o assessor que começou a confusão. O vídeo mostra que o Deputado Rogério Correia, não Senador, deu um tapa na mão do assessor que segurava um celular. O celular em questão acabou caindo sobre Soraya. https://www.poder360.com.br/congresso/deputado-do-pt-bateu-em-celular-que-caiu-na-cabeca-de-senadora/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-19 05:42:34 UTC (1697694154083) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-10-20 06:10:01 UTC (1697782201371) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-19 14:40:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 13:49:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 12:28:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 12:07:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 11:07:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 09:19:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 09:17:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 08:54:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 08:50:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 08:38:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 08:24:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 06:41:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 06:10:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 04:58:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 04:29:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 02:56:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 01:28:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-20 05:39:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-20 17:33:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-20 04:23:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 11:01:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 10:39:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 09:59:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 08:12:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 06:17:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 06:09:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 05:55:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 05:13:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 04:46:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 04:33:29 -0500 | Rating Details |