Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-19 02:44:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Schneider v. Rusk, the case referenced, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/

Written by BCC6CA7842E592E0D0DF56419B33F7BD3E1EC9BB6333247B7FDEC8FB29584446
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714830715232387569

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714834968818614500
  • noteId - 1714834968818614500
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BCC6CA7842E592E0D0DF56419B33F7BD3E1EC9BB6333247B7FDEC8FB29584446 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697683491317
  • tweetId - 1714830715232387569
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Schneider v. Rusk, the case referenced, requires that all citizens be treated equally under the law. However, the majority made one exception: "The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the 'natural born' citizen is eligible to be President" Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/163/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-19 02:44:51 UTC
(1697683491317)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-20 06:10:01 UTC
(1697782201371)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-19 02:05:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 01:44:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 01:09:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 00:24:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-21 02:13:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 12:12:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 09:31:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 02:43:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 23:08:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 23:01:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 22:06:51 -0500 Rating Details