Birdwatch Note
2023-10-18 10:19:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The man is not 472 years old. The oldest living person died at the age of 122 years in 1997. This is a hoax video that has been circulating around the world with different ages. https://www.insider.com/videos-elderly-man-monk-thailand-viral-age-rumors-2022-3?amp https://thetab.com/uk/2022/02/22/ok-so-the-old-man-on-tiktok-isnt-actually-163-years-old-241586
Written by 984299E3FAE0E346767367E826967375573F1A38FA6361A692A2995B02817E8B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713563259125534864
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1714586959945855345
- noteId - 1714586959945855345
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 984299E3FAE0E346767367E826967375573F1A38FA6361A692A2995B02817E8B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697624361393
- tweetId - 1713563259125534864
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The man is not 472 years old. The oldest living person died at the age of 122 years in 1997. This is a hoax video that has been circulating around the world with different ages. https://www.insider.com/videos-elderly-man-monk-thailand-viral-age-rumors-2022-3?amp https://thetab.com/uk/2022/02/22/ok-so-the-old-man-on-tiktok-isnt-actually-163-years-old-241586
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-10-18 10:19:21 UTC (1697624361393) |
2023-10-18 22:49:44 UTC (1697669384188) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-19 05:28:58 UTC (1697693338206) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-18 22:49:44 UTC (1697669384188) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-10-18 17:44:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 17:28:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 17:00:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 16:41:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 16:39:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:40:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:27:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:18:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 13:52:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 13:20:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 12:57:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 12:34:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 11:42:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 11:31:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 11:05:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 11:02:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 10:37:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 09:59:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 09:36:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 09:27:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 06:39:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 06:27:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 06:22:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:54:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:48:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:43:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:35:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:29:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:27:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 05:24:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 11:12:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 07:12:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 01:05:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 22:39:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 19:59:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 09:59:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 06:31:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-19 05:37:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 23:33:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 21:09:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 17:22:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 17:19:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 16:48:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 16:12:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:25:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:18:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 15:09:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:56:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:46:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:40:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:37:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:34:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:04:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 14:00:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 13:44:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 13:16:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 12:08:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 11:07:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 10:56:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 10:52:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 09:15:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 08:59:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 08:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 08:34:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 08:28:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 08:01:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 07:57:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-10-18 07:38:02 -0500 | Rating Details |