Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-18 03:55:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As explained in detail by this reply from @gherkinit, Schwab is safer than SVB because it has different kinds of businesses and more backup money. Saying they're in big trouble like SVB is like comparing apples to oranges. https://twitter.com/gherkinit/status/1714438011977355484

Written by FF43FC65A52467A55D01EE9F55AD708044C70B0040DBD82674DA02C1280DC2AA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714357475770503552

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714490388512477518
  • noteId - 1714490388512477518
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FF43FC65A52467A55D01EE9F55AD708044C70B0040DBD82674DA02C1280DC2AA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697601336971
  • tweetId - 1714357475770503552
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As explained in detail by this reply from @gherkinit, Schwab is safer than SVB because it has different kinds of businesses and more backup money. Saying they're in big trouble like SVB is like comparing apples to oranges. https://twitter.com/gherkinit/status/1714438011977355484

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-18 03:55:36 UTC
(1697601336971)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-19 05:28:58 UTC
(1697693338206)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-18 05:41:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:55:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:49:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 02:38:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 00:20:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 23:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 23:27:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 23:21:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 14:52:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:25:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:08:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 09:41:24 -0500 Rating Details