Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-17 23:19:46 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Israelis strongly dispute that the hospital was hit by them, as do Hamas. Neither version can be verified at the moment and this post makes an unwarranted claim exculpating Hamas. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/israel-denies-it-was-behind-gaza-hospital-strike-2mvc7kzmx

Written by C1C05A393A498DBDE18B72854E2526E2699ECB285FDC1FD9066D56F9C61DDD48
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714334370851340511

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714420970658627869
  • noteId - 1714420970658627869
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C1C05A393A498DBDE18B72854E2526E2699ECB285FDC1FD9066D56F9C61DDD48 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697584786463
  • tweetId - 1714334370851340511
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Israelis strongly dispute that the hospital was hit by them, as do Hamas. Neither version can be verified at the moment and this post makes an unwarranted claim exculpating Hamas. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/israel-denies-it-was-behind-gaza-hospital-strike-2mvc7kzmx

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-17 23:19:46 UTC
(1697584786463)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-17 18:46:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 18:43:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 18:32:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 18:28:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 18:21:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 12:51:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:54:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 07:31:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 07:13:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 05:32:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 04:48:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 04:15:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:47:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:29:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:22:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:14:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:14:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 02:54:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 02:36:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 01:49:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 00:44:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 00:32:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 00:25:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 00:23:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 23:48:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:32:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:11:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:01:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 02:34:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-19 01:21:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-23 16:55:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 16:46:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 11:29:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 11:22:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:14:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 07:28:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-18 18:51:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 18:31:17 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-18 17:55:40 -0600 Rating Details