Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-17 20:59:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweet accurately quotes Israeli military sources. The Reuters story literally has the line: "Reuters could not independently verify who was responsible for the blast." So the proposed CN is incorrect. NNN https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/diplomats-renew-calls-gaza-aid-iran-warns-israel-2023-10-16/

Written by E1EE5E1CDB0D05CB289C2F92176E1447AB9F09872A5E9AFDAC7C2170BC1F78EF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714373630669308374

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714385691910795459
  • noteId - 1714385691910795459
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E1EE5E1CDB0D05CB289C2F92176E1447AB9F09872A5E9AFDAC7C2170BC1F78EF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697576375356
  • tweetId - 1714373630669308374
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet accurately quotes Israeli military sources. The Reuters story literally has the line: "Reuters could not independently verify who was responsible for the blast." So the proposed CN is incorrect. NNN https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/diplomats-renew-calls-gaza-aid-iran-warns-israel-2023-10-16/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-17 20:59:35 UTC
(1697576375356)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-17 17:59:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 17:08:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 16:56:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 16:27:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 16:21:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 16:02:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 10:26:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 03:22:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 20:00:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-12-28 12:55:14 -0600 Rating Details