Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-16 22:26:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Hijab did respond to the question, where he contrasted it with a hypothetical with the IRA, but both debaters strayed away from the point, there was no 'dodging' or 'asking different questions'. The tweet author probably did not understand the conversation. https://youtu.be/9jBgGY2Ww9Q?t=659

Written by 04A4BE63FFDDDD317C95BD278B60B11F8F169E0AC3B329AD6F1DBBFDB92ED3DF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1714034203124289870

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1714045058280747204
  • noteId - 1714045058280747204
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 04A4BE63FFDDDD317C95BD278B60B11F8F169E0AC3B329AD6F1DBBFDB92ED3DF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697495161974
  • tweetId - 1714034203124289870
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Hijab did respond to the question, where he contrasted it with a hypothetical with the IRA, but both debaters strayed away from the point, there was no 'dodging' or 'asking different questions'. The tweet author probably did not understand the conversation. https://youtu.be/9jBgGY2Ww9Q?t=659

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-16 22:26:01 UTC
(1697495161974)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-16 18:44:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 18:32:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 04:36:58 -0500 Rating Details