Birdwatch Note
2023-10-16 12:16:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
El teorema de Fermat-Wiles afirma que no existe solución para dicha ecuación en el caso n>2: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2016-03-15-fermats-last-theorem-proof-secures-mathematics-top-prize-sir-andrew-wiles En el caso n=2, en cambio, sí existen. Por ejemplo, basta tomar a=3, b=4 y c=5.
Written by 8A098ECDD386B6070F9B4A176B325535DF8514C1849C13536ADB892AE1694B2E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713886905836675509
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1713891755433611500
- noteId - 1713891755433611500
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8A098ECDD386B6070F9B4A176B325535DF8514C1849C13536ADB892AE1694B2E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1697458611720
- tweetId - 1713886905836675509
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- El teorema de Fermat-Wiles afirma que no existe solución para dicha ecuación en el caso n>2: https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2016-03-15-fermats-last-theorem-proof-secures-mathematics-top-prize-sir-andrew-wiles En el caso n=2, en cambio, sí existen. Por ejemplo, basta tomar a=3, b=4 y c=5.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-10-16 12:16:51 UTC (1697458611720) |
2023-10-16 21:47:44 UTC (1697492864278) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC (1697597616809) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-10-16 21:47:44 UTC (1697492864278) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-10-16 14:50:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 13:32:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 12:18:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 11:23:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 10:46:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 10:02:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 08:20:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:58:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:44:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:40:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:33:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:31:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:28:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 07:24:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-17 12:42:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-17 08:51:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-17 05:12:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-17 02:43:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-16 20:47:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-18 15:00:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-10-18 08:03:32 -0500 | Rating Details |