Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-16 11:14:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

O PCP não ganhou um cêntimo. O PCP opôs-se à destruição dos azulejos (património) e retirou-os para entregar à Câmara antes de aprovar o projecto. O PCP vai manter o mesmo espaço que tinha, e a troco a imobiliária fica com o resto do edifício, paga a remodelação e lucrará com ele

Written by 93E0B8354D6A2848B10528D0BCE362CA4F68BE835FB48E63352EED6DFB59AB75
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1713846605265141805

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1713876154266898942
  • noteId - 1713876154266898942
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 93E0B8354D6A2848B10528D0BCE362CA4F68BE835FB48E63352EED6DFB59AB75 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697454892113
  • tweetId - 1713846605265141805
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 1
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • O PCP não ganhou um cêntimo. O PCP opôs-se à destruição dos azulejos (património) e retirou-os para entregar à Câmara antes de aprovar o projecto. O PCP vai manter o mesmo espaço que tinha, e a troco a imobiliária fica com o resto do edifício, paga a remodelação e lucrará com ele

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-16 11:14:52 UTC
(1697454892113)
2023-10-16 20:58:03 UTC
(1697489883874)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-10-18 02:53:36 UTC
(1697597616809)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-10-16 20:58:03 UTC
(1697489883874)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-16 17:45:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 16:01:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 15:52:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 15:30:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 15:23:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 12:36:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 12:14:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 10:49:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 10:27:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 09:04:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:56:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:52:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:29:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 08:25:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 07:18:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 07:09:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 06:35:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 06:19:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-17 01:21:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-16 20:53:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 04:43:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-18 15:03:41 -0500 Rating Details